Oregon lawmakers, grassroots organizations push for evidence-based, financially responsible climate bill to protect state's investments and retirees

February 8, 2023

Oregon lawmakers, grassroots organizations push for evidence-based, financially responsible climate bill to protect state's investments and retirees.


Salem, OR -- The 2023 Oregon Treasury Investment and Climate Act (HB 2601) addresses the major financial risks posed by climate change and fossil fuel investments, while promoting accountability in the management of Oregon’s investments, said Divest Oregon. State Treasurer Tobias Read has defended the state’s fossil fuel holdings, despite the risks flagged by the Oregon State Treasury’s own consultants and the Treasurer’s release of a long-term decarbonization timeline. The first public hearing for HB 2601 will be held on Thursday, February 16, 2023 in Salem. 


State Representatives Pham (HD36), Dexter (HD33), and Gamba (HD41) and State Senator Golden (SD3) are sponsoring HB 2601, which will put a moratorium on new carbon-intensive investments made by the Oregon State Treasury and establish a timeline for the Treasury to drop its carbon-intensive holdings. As part of this decarbonization process, HB 2601 also requires the Treasury to disclose its holdings and show its progress to lawmakers and the public. The Treasury manages $137 billion, with most of this in the Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS). 


“This bill is about preparing Oregonians for a financial future shaped by the ongoing transition to clean energy,” said Chris Abbruzzese, an Oregon-based investor and former financial risk manager. “Fossil fuels are currently being phased out globally, yet the Oregon State Treasury continues to invest in these assets, oftentimes through contracts that extend beyond 10 years. By the time climate change becomes a defining issue for financial valuation, it may be too late to eliminate these investments from the PERS portfolio. PERS fiduciaries, like the Treasurer and members of the Oregon Investment Council, serve for four-year terms, a time horizon that is too short given the longer-term issues at hand. As such, we need legislators to act now to limit these actors’ ability to be seduced by short-term returns at the expense of beneficiaries’ longer-term best interests. This bill acknowledges this fiduciary disconnect and protects retirees’ long-term interests as required by Oregon law with an appropriate level of urgency.”


The Oregon State Treasury, which is responsible for the
pensions of 393,080 Oregonians, has at least $5.3 billion invested in fossil fuel companies. The Treasury is notable for its large interest in private investment funds by contracted managers, including over a quarter in Treasury's private equity class alone. How those outside managers invest this money is kept from public disclosure by state law. Many private equity funds are heavily invested in fossil fuels. As the world transitions to new energy sources, investors left holding stock in fossil fuel companies -- or locked into 10-12 year contracts with private equity firms -- face the likelihood of these investments becoming riskier, or even worthless, over time.

“Unfortunately, risk to the PERS portfolio because of climate change is not theoretical,”
said Susan Palmiter, volunteer Co-lead of Divest Oregon. “We saw how holding on to risky investments for too long results in losses. Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the Oregon State Treasury was left with worthless stock in Russian companies.”


A
February 2022 report prepared by Ortec Finance, contracted by the Oregon State Treasury, demonstrates the "significant negative impacts" of retaining fossil-fuel holdings. The report, which was released to Divest Oregon after the Treasurer wrote to the Oregon legislature in January 2023, shows that the baseline loss over the next 5 years for not divesting from PERS fossil fuel holdings would be 14.5% in a "disorderly [energy] transition" (the current state of affairs). 


The report also points out that switching out all of the Treasury's public equity holdings in fossil fuel companies would be a positive move in the next 5 years. This corroborates the findings of Divest Oregon’s “Risky Business” report (April 2022) that determined PERS underperformed by $4-10 billion in the past decade due to the drag by fossil fuel investments. In the past decade, this is a loss of up to $6,000 for each PERS retiree per year.


“The Treasurer is treating this time of upheaval as business as usual. He is resisting HB 2601 despite the mounting evidence of long-term decline in the value of fossil fuel investments, his public support for decarbonization of the Treasury investments, the losses that PERS retirees have experienced over the past decade, and the recommendations of his own consultants,” said Jenifer Schramm, volunteer Co-lead of Divest Oregon. “In fact, the Treasury has even made new long-term fossil fuel investments to the tune of half a billion dollars in the month since the bill became public. Rather than obstructing this effort, the Treasury could use this bill to show his support for evidenced-based, financially responsible investing.” 


Oregon’s PERS performance lags behind peers, both in terms of real returns and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) standards. Of the top 15 largest US public pension funds, the 5- and 10-year returns for PERS are near the bottom of the pack. 

Of these large pension funds, PERS has the highest exposure to private equity investments, which are opaque and difficult to exit quickly. According to the Pew Research Center these types of “risky, high-fee assets … must be scrutinized for transparent reporting.”


“This bill is as much about accountability and transparency, as it is about financial responsibility and climate-smart investing,” said Andrew Bogrand, volunteer Communications Director of Divest Oregon. “Not only does Oregon’s legislature need to mandate an end to new fossil fuel investments and a phased approach to decarbonization, but it must play an oversight role. Discrepancies and public records delays suggest a lack of transparency, as do risky and questionable holdings. HB 2601 will better ensure accountability and help align our state’s investments with our state’s values.”


The Oregon State Treasury has come under national scrutiny for investing in the NSO Group
, a spyware company which was blacklisted by the US government after revelations emerged that its signature product was used to spy on dissidents, activists, and diplomats. According to the United Nations, the Treasury also ranks 46th out of 47th for ESG investing among large public pensions. Poor ESG ratings are linked to poor financial performance. According to McKinsey,  “paying attention to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) concerns does not compromise returns — rather, the opposite.”


“A close look at coal, oil and gas portfolio performance provides overwhelming financial evidence that the industry has declined precipitously and that the outlook for oil and gas companies is negative,” said Tom Sanzillo, past Deputy Comptroller of New York State, and Director of Financial Analysis at IEEFA. “In the past 12 years, the MSCI All-Country World Index (ACWI) without fossil fuels outperformed the MSCI ACWI with fossil fuels. The gap exists even after accounting for the substantial oil price increases that occurred after the invasion of Ukraine.”


To date, over 1,550 institutions  representing over $40 trillion in assets have already committed to fossil fuel divestment. HB 2601 is supported by dozens of grassroots organizations across the state, including unions with PERS members, racial and climate justice groups, youth-led movements, and faith communities. 


–ENDS–


Notes to editors:

October 13, 2026
When Will the Oregon Treasury Comply with the COAL Act? Divest Oregon’s COAL Act passed in 2024. The statute mandates annual reporting by the Oregon State Treasury (OST) to the Legislature “on actions taken pursuant to the act.” The COAL Act spells out that OST can only remain in a thermal coal investment if the company is transitioning to clean energy on a reasonable timeline. A full report under the COAL Act would document where each coal company is in its transition process, when OST expects it to be completed, and actions that will be taken if the transition is not occurring. The Treasury’s 2025 Net Zero Plan Progress Report does not comply with the statute. Table 5, shown below, was presented with this text: Staff determined that as of November 30, 2025, the portfolio had $15 million worth of investments in 12 securities identified as “Thermal Coal” companies, a decrease from $28,979,710.04 worth of investments in 21 securities reported by staff in 2024. p. 26 Divest Oregon promptly pointed out (p. 16) the contrast between the report and the statute.
September 25, 2026
Global emissions are up. Private equity is a culprit – and so is the Oregon Treasury. Private Equity Climate Risks consortium has just published its latest scorecard and report , endorsed by 21 organizations working on climate, environmental justice, financial accountability, and consumer issues, documenting (pages 10-28) that: ⚠️ 20 private equity firms’ energy portfolios: are responsible for producing an estimated 1.5 gigatons of greenhouse gas emissions annually. include more than 1,000 assets: 244 energy companies 250 oil and gas fields 15,000 miles of pipelines 35 LNG terminals 13 coal terminals dozens of LNG tankers hundreds of fossil fuel power plants. The Guardian (9/15/2026) on the Private Equity Climate Risks report: World’s top 20 private equity firms produce more greenhouse gases a year than most countries, report finds : Firms manage $7.3tn in assets and could afford to transition away from fossil fuels yet invest in natural gas and coal-fired plants to power datacenters. “Private equity firms have emerged as the largest datacenter owners outside  of big tech.” (See the case study on data centers starting on p 25 of the report.) What about Oregon? ⚠️Six private funds, held by the Oregon Treasury, hold at least 473 fossil fuel assets. These firms are: Blackstone, Brookfield Asset Management, Encap Investments, EQT, Global Infrastructure Partners (GIP), Quantum Capital. All are in the Real Assets holdings. As Private Equity Stakeholder Project commented to the Oregon Investment Council (see Public Comment book of 9/2/2026 , page 8): Through existing OST fund commitments, OPERF likely has exposure to many of these 473 fossil fuel assets, which also create global climate risk. Some funds held by OST are making new investments in fossil fuels, pushing the pension fund further from Oregon’s Climate Resilience Investment Act (CRIA) goals and creating more risk for the fund. One example: BlackRock’s GIP. Oregon invested in GIP (Global Investment Partners fund), created to finance a new LNG terminal (see Is the Oregon State Treasury Supporting Environmental Racism in the Gulf South? Divest Oregon 9/26/2024). The fund is now managed by BlackRock and it plans to acquire AES, a massive US-based utility company that also backs 23 fossil fuel-fired power plants globally. If the AES deal closes, BlackRock’s GIP will nearly double its fossil fuel power plant portfolio to 50, spanning 11 countries.
August 6, 2026
“As a PERS beneficiary, I am horrified that my pension funds private prison contractors and ICE detention centers.” Three recent Letters to the Editor of The Oregonian voice deep disquiet that the Treasury invests in immigrant detention facilities and spyware that are internationally recognized as engaging in human rights abuses and are flagrantly violating constitutional rights – instead of constructive investments. In June 2025, Oregon Treasury data shows investment of $51 million in CoreCivic and Geo Group, private prison contractors, and Palantir, maker of surveillance software used by ICE against US residents. Divest Oregon has been asking the Treasurer for years : Why aren’t investments screened to comply with Oregon Investment Council standards? See the blog: Why is the Treasury still investing workers’ retirement in fossil fuels, ICE contractors, and surveillance technology? for the backstory. In May, Treasurer Steiner stated that Treasury used its shareholder power to vote against four candidates for Geo Group’s board of directors because it was not conforming to Treasury’s investment standards – but kept the stock: Treasurer Steiner is “ deeply troubled ” about ICE contractor Geo Group…but OST has been a shareholder for years. The Treasury is investing public employee money. It has a responsibility to the beneficiaries and to all of us to follow its own investment guidelines. The letters voice a strong call for change: PERS should divest from ICE-contract prisons ( PDF , The Oregonian 7/27/2026) “Human Rights Watch reports that 52 people died in the custody of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in the first 500 days of President Donald Trump’s second term…." “It is tempting to feel powerless about this senseless waste of life. But here in Oregon, we have an opportunity to make a difference. We can demand that the Oregon Public Employees Retirement System divest from The Geo Group and Core Civic, two of the largest for-profit private prison corporations, which contract with ICE to run immigration detention facilities.” Oregon shouldn’t invest in ICE prisons ( PDF , The Oregonian 7/31/2026) “As a PERS member, I am not comfortable profiting from other people’s misery, and I am confident that others feel the same." “Reduced public investments and increased public awareness could even make investments in Geo Group and CORE Civic less attractive. Oregon should lead opponents of the cruelty in this immigration crackdown, epitomized by these prisons." Divest PERS from ICE-contract prisons ( PDF , The Oregonian 8/3/2026) “As a PERS beneficiary, I am horrified that my pension funds private prison contractors and ICE detention centers." “Oregon State Treasurer Elizabeth Steiner said she was 'deeply troubled' by Geo Group’s practices, and that the Treasury had used its shareholder power to vote against four candidates for the company’s board. Has that vote had any noticeable effect? Will Geo Group change its business practices as a result? These companies might take notice if the Oregon Treasury began pulling its investments.” “Like the people of Minneapolis, Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek, Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield and Portland Mayor Keith Wilson stood up to ICE. This is the moment for our Treasury staff to show the same courage."
July 6, 2026
Photo by SpaceX on Unsplash In a July 1 article Reuters reported that Oregon Treasurer Steiner wanted guidance from the federal Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) about SpaceX. How should pension funds handle the new company with the giant market valuation? SEC Commissioner Mark Uyeda answered Elizabeth Steiner in an interview in Reuters . One takeaway is his simple point that if you don't like the governance arrangements of a stock, don't buy it. A message from the SEC's Uyeda: If you don't like SpaceX's governance, don't buy the shares ( Reuters Sustainable Finance , July 1, 2026) Note: The Oregon State Treasury has $6.8 million in exposure to SpaceX through one public equity index fund and one global equity portfolio ( Portland Business Journal July 2, 2026). Divest Oregon has made the same point to Treasurer Steiner, repeatedly. For example, Treasurer Steiner posted on Facebook on May 6, 2026 that she is “deeply troubled” by the ways ICE contractor Geo Group fails to adhere to Oregon Investment Council (OIC) policy. Divest Oregon responded : The Oregon Treasury has held stock in private prison/immigrant detention contractors for years, in spite of well-publicized abuse. If a company is violating OIC policy the Treasury has an obligation to sell the stock. In fact, Treasury’s screening process can and should prevent purchasing or holding stock that violates OIC/Treasury standards. The SEC Commissioner quoted in the Reuters ’ interview about SpaceX also says pension funds have the duty and ability to do such screening: Question by Reuters to SEC Commissioner Uyeda: "You write that ‘If prospective investors have concerns with the governance arrangements, then their most powerful tool is to not purchase shares of the stock.’ But critics like some big pension funds say the fast-track addition of SpaceX to big indexes could make them unwilling buyers of the stock. What would you say to such critics? Response from SEC Commissioner Uyeda: "Large pension funds have choices with respect to ​their investment decisions as part of their fiduciary duty to the plan. While index funds may have certain conveniences and low costs, there is a trade-off to outsourcing securities selection to a third party. There are alternatives, such as selecting a fund that follows a different index or is actively managed, or engaging in customized direct indexing that would provide more control over the portfolio.”
May 19, 2026
A Geo Group van leaving the Northwest ICE Processing Center in Portland Oregon. May 2026
April 9, 2026
At the March 2026 OIC meeting, John Goldstein from Goldman Sachs spoke of the strength of renewable energy stocks (recap in Net Zero Investor 5/3/2026 ). Bill McKibben shows us how the sector is evolving with battery technology advances. Night into Day ( The Crucial Years substack 3/30/2026): “For the first time, the United States now has the capacity to supply 100% of domestic energy storage project demand with American-built systems,” said Noah Roberts, executive director of the U.S. Energy Storage Coalition. “That is a fundamental shift from where we were just a year and a half ago, when the majority of battery storage systems were imported.” “Already, the U.S. has enough capacity to meet demand for finished grid battery enclosures…. By the end of this year, the U.S. will also achieve self-sufficiency in a higher-value part of the supply chain: the battery cells themselves. It’s a major industrial coup that is bringing thousands of high-tech manufacturing jobs to communities across the country.” Solid-state batteries are becoming a possibility; they promise to solve several problems: “Batteries are now being tested by multiple companies that can go 800 miles on a single charge….“In September, Mercedes drove a modified EQS over 1,200 km (745 miles) using 106 Ah solid-state battery cells supplied by US-based Factorial Energy. Factorial launched the first commercial solid-state battery program in the US …earlier this year.” The Finnish company Donut Labs shows where this is heading: “The Donut batt can charge to full in five minutes…; has a practically unlimited lifespan (100,000 charging cycles); is unaffected by heat and cold (-30C to 100C); and contains no rare earth, precious metals or flammable liquid electrolytes. With all that, Donut Lab says it will be cheaper to produce than conventional lithium-ion batteries…” “And the technological miracles are only beginning. For instance, Christopher Mims reported last week in the Journal on a new round of ‘thermal batteries that store solar power as heat instead of electricity, perfect for use in high-temperature industrial processes.’” “Marija Maisch was reporting in January that…salt-based batteries are nearing price and performance parity, if not for cars then for utility scale batteries.” And this chart shows the surge of batteries coming online as solar installations lose sunlight. Night into day.
March 17, 2026
A question from Divest Oregon, a coalition of a hundred organizations with strong PERS representation, remains unanswered: What screening process does the Oregon State Treasury (OST) use, if any, when investing PERS funds or choosing investment managers? Is the Treasury screening investments in fossil fuel companies? Andrew Bogrand, Divest Oregon’s Communications Director, spoke at the Oregon Investment Council (OIC) in January 2026. He noted that investment in fossil fuels contributes to global instability, using Venezuela as an example. (See this blog .) The current Iran war emphasizes this point. Andrew regularly comments on the ties between insecurity and fossil fuels as a policy lead for human rights and natural resource justice at Oxfam. The argument that fossil fuel investments are a sensible diversification of a portfolio has long been outdated. But looking at the most recently published June 2025 public equity and fixed income data, the Treasury is still investing in fossil fuels. Under fiduciary duty and the Climate Resilience Investment Act ( CRIA ), the Treasury must move to alternative investments that align with the reality of climate change and a rapidly destabilizing world. Is the Treasury screening investments prone to legal liability, human rights abuses, or reputational risk? In an April 2023 report , Divest Oregon called out the Treasury's investment in private prisons and surveillance technology as context for the question: Does the Treasury have a screening process? If so, what is the screening process? One example given in that report was the NSO/spyware technology that OST heavily invested in. The Guardian reported extensively (2022) on the OST’s investment in NSO/Pegasus spyware: “However, it now appears that the Oregon pension fund, one of the most prominent in the US, gave its tacit approval over an investment in NSO several years ago – at a time when security researchers were already publicly raising alarms about the company.” In a more recent report, Oregon Treasury’s Investment Screening Failures ( October 2025 ), Divest Oregon again questioned the Treasury’s investment screening process. Examples of questionable investments included GEO Group, CoreCivic, and Palantir. Investments in GEO Group and CoreCivic fund private prison contractors and ICE detention centers. Investment in Palantir funds ICE surveillance software used against US residents. See additional information below for each of these companies. The most recent public data ( June 2025 ) shows that the Treasury continues to invest in these private prison and surveillance technology companies with a long history of human rights abuses and legal vulnerability. These companies are central to the current federal administration’s construction of a police state and its massive violation of due process. See Trump’s Mass Deportation Campaign ( The New Yorker 3/15/2026). For example: Recent private prison contractor GEO Group news: In February 2026, the Supreme Court found that GEO Group, a private prison operator running an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility, cannot claim governmental immunity from lawsuits for violating human trafficking laws, even if those violations were under government orders. Recent surveillance technology company Palantir news: In Portland, now, Palantir’s Elite app is being used to identify potential deportation targets, generate dossiers on individuals and provide a “confidence score” on the person’s address. ( The Guardian 3/13/2026) Why should the Treasury screen its investments? Screening is necessary to avoid investments that contravene Treasury standards, OIC policy, legal standards including fiduciary duty, or Oregon State law. For instance: The Oregon Department of Justice has recently opened an inquiry as to whether OST investment in companies with contractual ties to ICE violates the Oregon Sanctuary Promise Act of 2021 . The CRIA Act of 2025 mandates that the Treasury: -- “actively analyze and manage” climate risk to the portfolio -- report on its progress toward investing in public equity holdings that incorporate the tenets of a just transition in their overall priorities and portfolio
February 18, 2026
Part 2: Building on Oregon State Treasury’s 2025 Progress toward Net Zero Emissions Divest Oregon applauds initial action, offers recommendations for future reporting, including the use of multiple metrics
February 18, 2026
Part 1: Building on Oregon State Treasury’s 2025 Progress toward Net Zero Emissions Divest Oregon applauds initial action, offers recommendations for future reporting, including the use of multiple metrics